CASE NUMBER

SUPREME COURT*

MALINDA NICOLE Di ROSA

PETITIONER

V.

STATE OF LOUISIANA

RESPONDENT

AMENDMENT TO THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FROM THE

26TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, BOSSIER PARISH, LOUISIANA

IN CASES CRIMINAL DOCKET NUMBERED: 172,621; 172,622; 172,623

AND

NOTICE OF THE UNEXPLAINED SILENCE OF THE COURT.

MALINDA NICOLE Di ROSA

IN PROPER PERSON

C/O 318 LAKESHORE PKWY.

NEW ORLEANS, LA 70124

XXX - XXX -XXXX

*To be construed as a reference to the same supreme Court created by Article III Section 1 of the United States Constitution. Name and / or address correction demanded.

Comes now into court Malinda Nicole DiRosa, a Sovereign, Citizen of the State of Louisiana, to notice this court of a change in the service of the copies of the Writ of Habeas Corpus, to present new evidence for the need of intervention by the only court with competent jurisdiction, conferred by the Constitution in one supreme Court, and to inquire as to the silence of the Court which has forced Malinda Nicole DiRosa to suffer more abuse at the hands of the occupational government and their pretend agencies and rules of tyranny.

If anyone has any cause or reason to believe that Malinda Nicole DiRosa is not a Sovereign, Citizen of the State of Louisiana, let them bring forth their claim so it can be denounced as the fraud that it is. Surely it can have nothing to do with a bona fide residence as demanded by the illegal 14^th amendment. Since the illegal 14^th amendment has trampled my right to be a Citizen of the State of Louisiana into the dirt, any cession of land would be an illegal nullity much like the overthrow of congress, the invasion of the State of Louisiana and nine other States and, through the use of the occupational governments pretending to be legitimate State governments, the change in our national constitution at the point of a bayonet. Surely it can not be any agreements forced upon me, at the point of a bayonet, by the occupational government of Louisiana. There has been no legal law passed, nor legal treaty signed, nor legal agency created by the treasonous conspirators since they overthrew congress and invaded Louisiana and nine other States.

Nor, can it be said that there is some problem with the State of Louisiana being the respondent. As has been conclusively shown, this entity calling itself the State of Louisiana is a fraud with pretend authority who is attacking me. This entity calling itself the State of Louisiana is, in reality, an occupational government of the invading state. Nor can there be any doubt that this entity calling itself the State of Louisiana and its agents does continue to harass and prosecute this Sovereign with illegal arrests, detentions, and pretend freedom under the thumb of its agents called bonding companies. There can be no doubt, the constitution of the occupational government of the invading state pretending to be the legal constitution of the State of Louisiana does so confess. There is no Citizen of the State of Louisiana to be found anywhere in the occupational government calling itself the State of Louisiana. Citizens of the State of Louisiana are expressly forbidden representation and their interests are not only uncared for but they are the targets of abuse and persecution by the occupational government of the invading state, as we are about to see yet again. Who is this entity fraudulently calling itself the State of Louisiana? It surely is not the representatives of the Sovereign Citizens of the State of Louisiana. The Sovereign Citizens of the State of Louisiana have been overthrown by illegal invasion and are unrepresented and their interests uncared for in the hands of the occupational government of a state foreign to the State of Louisiana.

On the 2^nd day of July, 2009 Michael E. DiRosa, translator, next friend and father of Malinda Nicole DiRosa did, with Malinda Nicole DiRosa's full knowledge and authorization, prepare and send an accurate translation of Malinda Nicole DiRosa's position and demand for the supreme Court to do its duty and obligation and stop the 26^th Judicial Court from committing the worst act a court can commit. To knowingly proceed absent jurisdiction and absent a valid cause of action, right of action and standing of the alleged Plaintiff in the above entitled, fraudulently brought, infamous crimes. This petition to the supreme Court was sent by entrusting the documents to the United States Postal Authority, Express mail, next day service, return receipt requested (tracking number EH 954810669 US.)

Also, on the 2^nd day of July, 2009 Michael E. DiRosa, translator, next friend and father of Malinda Nicole DiRosa did, with Malinda Nicole DiRosa's full knowledge and authorization, prepare and send accurate copies of the accurate translation of Malinda Nicole DiRosa's position and demand for the supreme Court to do its duty and obligation and stop the 26^th Judicial Court from committing the worst act a court can commit. To knowingly proceed absent jurisdiction and absent a valid cause of action, right of action and standing of the alleged Plaintiff in the above entitled, fraudulently brought, infamous crimes. These copies were sent to the Clerk of the 26^th judicial district court (one copy for the court, one copy for the district attorney) by entrusting the documents to the United States Postal Authority, Express mail, next day service, return receipt requested (tracking number EH 954810655 US.)

According to the United States Postal Authority's official web site as of the 6^th day of July, 2009 notice of these two pieces of mail were left at the supreme Court on the 3^rd and 5^th days of July, 2009 and at the post office box of the 26^th judicial district court on the 3^rd day of July, 2009 and both pieces of mail were accepted on the 6^th day of July, 2009. The supreme Court accepted mail (tracking number EH 954810669 US) at 7:47 am and the 26^th judicial district court accepted mail (tracking number EH 954810655 US) at 9:10 am.

Curiously, in the 9 days that have elapsed, the return receipt from the supreme Court has not been received, nor has any mail been returned.

As of the 15^th day of July, no word has been heard from the supreme Court or its clerk. In fact there has been only one unaccounted for telephone call and that came on the 6^th day of July, 2009 at about 9:45 am. A person who did not identify himself did call XXX - XXX - XXXX The caller verified the correct number but was trying to reach a Mr. Davis. When told that there is no Mr. Davis here. The unidentified caller immediately hung up. Was this just an odd coincidence, or was it the clerk of the supreme Court?

It seems to be a pattern that the clerks of court fall on the sword for their lords and masters. It can be seen in the record of cases numbered 2007 -KH-131 and 2007 -KH-866 on the docket of the Louisiana Supreme Court where the clerk of that court showed a full hand in the fraudulent corruption of the official record, despite numerous unheard objections put before the illegally set Louisiana Supreme Court. (There is not one Citizen of the State of Louisiana on the Louisiana Supreme Court. All are citizens and subjects of a state foreign to the State of Louisiana.)

Now, another unnamed clerk falls on the sword in cases numbered 172,621; 172,622; 172,623 on the criminal docket of the 26^th judicial district court. On the 8^th day of July, 2009, Malinda Nicole DiRosa, hereinafter known as Victim or Petitioner, did receive, at the address of record, the return of service with an attached note stating that these copies were returned for an original signature. (lower half of Exhibit C )

A cover letter was prepared and sent (upper half of Exhibit C ) entrusting the documents to the United States Postal Authority, Express mail, next day service, return receipt requested (tracking number EH 653402679 US) with the returned copies enclosed and on each copy a Postit note specifying that one was a copy for the court and one was a copy for the district attorney and that the original had been sent to the supreme Court.

On the 13^th day of July, 2009 a package was received at the address of record from the clerk of court 26^th judicial district court. This package contained a cover letter (Exhibit D ) again demanding an original signature on copies. Is it not curious that the cover letter was not signed? The clerk of the 26^th judicial district court had no trouble filing copies in cases numbered 157,313 and 157,314 when this Victim appealed to the court of appeal, second circuit, State of Louisiana not as a grant of jurisdiction but under their obligation to forward the charges to the only court with jurisdiction the one court in which the judicial power of the United States shall be vested. An improperly set Louisiana Supreme Court was not an option.

Is it the intention of the unnamed clerk of the 26^th judicial district court to help the court handle cases that all know are not addressed to them and that they are jurisdictionally incompetent to hear, under any pretext available? The clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States repeatedly used this ploy. On the face of the record our treasonous acts are hidden, painted with the color of law.

Is this the new rule of law in Louisiana? Cheat as hard as you can until you can find a hook to hang your conscience and a brush to white wash the truth as you betray everyone who has ever seen your face. The record is clear. The facts are indisputable.

One must question the definition of self-evident unalienable rights. The treasonous conspirators stole them and made them as alienable as a bona fide residence. The Butchers in the Slaughterhouse cases were ostensibly denied their rights for an error in pleading made by the officer of the court representing them who pled them as freed slaves. There can be no doubt that the 26^th judicial district court is going to try every trick it can find to pretend that some law of man or God is being followed. Their record is consistent.

It must also be noticed that on the 8^th day of July, 2009 Malinda Nicole DiRosa was brought, by the gun barrel of the occupational government, to stand, in court. There, the sitting judge and the district attorney, both knowing full well, as is their duty, that this alleged Defendant was before the wrong judge and did try to circumvent, again, the lottery system of judge selection and, again, try to force jurisdiction on the victim as was admitted in open court.

One can now again see the depths that these vile, treasonous thieves will stoop to gain some pretext of jurisdiction, however thin. For, when the color of law is stripped from their deeds there is only the stark reality of vile, treasonous tyrants who have betrayed their families, their countrymen and everyone who has ever seen their face. One must question just what the L.S.A.T. is testing for.

It has to be obvious that the letter from the unidentified clerk too ashamed of his/her overt act of treason against the State of Louisiana and its Sovereign Citizens to identify him/her self is a ruse to cunningly defraud this victim into a pretend jurisdiction, as is the note ostensibly from Cynthia J. Johnston, the Bossier Parish Clerk of Court. (Was the note written by the clerk or was her stationary used without her knowledge? Or, in more colloquial terms, was she set up to take the fall?) Is this what self-evident unalienable rights have come to mean under the occupational government? Is an errant comment, a slip of the pen, or a misplaced jot or tittle enough to turn a sovereign into a subject? There can be no doubt that no law of man or God is being followed in the State of Louisiana, just naked tyranny hiding behind the color of law and the face of a fraudulent record. Can there be any doubt? It is confessed.

There can be no doubt that this Sovereign, Citizen of the State of Louisiana is being harassed as a direct result of the submission of a formal accusation of Treason against the State of Louisiana and its sovereign people. This document was intercepted by the clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States who did return it by summary judgment. Hence, this document was corrected to again, but more correctly, specify the supreme Court created by article III of the constitution and to specifically exclude the Supreme Court of the United States, the highest inferior court that congress may from time to time ordain and establish. This document was included and resubmitted with the petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (tracking number EH 954810669 US.)

Copies of the formal accusation of treason against the State of Louisiana on the oath of two witnesses to the same overt acts sent to the supreme Court were served on BOBBY JINDAL and JAMES D. "BUDDY" CALDWELL also on the 6^th of July, 2009 as postal records show.

Even if an illegal congress could, by some enormous stretch of reason, limit the power of the supreme Court to remove habeas corpus power, one of our most sacred rights, there can be no argument that it is the duty and obligation of this Court to hear this charge of treason, as it was the duty and obligation of Malinda Nicole DiRosa and Michael E. DiRosa to bring these charges.

Malinda Nicole DiRosa and Michael E. DiRosa are perplexed by the silence of the Court. Surely, if there were some errant jot or tittle we would have been notified and corrective actions taken. Or, is another clerk falling on the sword for their lord and master?

Surely it can not be the lack of witnesses to the signatures as this action is taken openly and notoriously by the belligerent claimants, in person, and we will repeat the charges to anyone who will listen. Plus, this is not only the oath of two witness, these charges have been confessed in no less a document than the Louisiana State constitution, forced upon us, by the occupational government of the invading state.

There can be no doubt that the Department of Public Safety and Corrections is a puppet of the occupational governor of the conquered State of Louisiana. The Louisiana revised statutes of the occupational government tell us so in chapter 9.

Nor, can there be any doubt that the district attorney is an agent of the attorney general of the occupational government of the conquered State of Louisiana, fraudulently trying to convict me of pretend offenses. The Louisiana State constitution, forced upon us, by the occupational government of the invading state tells us so. The Agents of the invading state have even started to harass people close to me threatening them with debtors prison and / or house arrest by decree of the tyrannical occupational government as they have done to Michael E. DiRosa these past years, absent valid charge, absent trial or any pretense of due process of law.

It could be said that the invasion and overthrow of the State of Louisiana and its Sovereign people was legal until someone complained correctly. Hence, the vile treasonous members of the Louisiana bar association were just following the rules as written. This argument, however flimsy, is sinking fast. With every day of delay the proof of a cover up keeps mounting. One would hope that the one supreme Court in which the judicial power of the United States shall be vested would stand as people of Honor and admit that the deception is over and end this unconscionable abuse of the Sovereign Citizens of the State of Louisiana by the conquering state.

Malinda Nicole DiRosa does further notice this Court that she is in fear for her life and safety as this area has a history of turning cameras off and when the camera comes back on the woman is lying in a pool of her own blood. Plus, cases numbered 157,313 and 157,314 on the Docket of the 26^th Judicial District court show a continued pattern of abuse and harassment by agents of the occupational government. Malinda Nicole DiRosa does remind the Court and all concerned that she did not hire the piper, nor call the tune and that she and her interpreter, next friend and father just seem to be sitting when the music stopped. However, it does seem to be evident that the song of deception has finally come to an end.

There can be no doubt that it is just a matter of time before the truth becomes widely known, the only real question is how soon and how orderly will the transition be? There is little face left to save. Everything is unimpeachably confessed by the occupational government of the invaders and enslavers of the Sovereign Citizens of the State of Louisiana. One can now only count jots and tittles under color of law to hide the treason against the State of Louisiana and its sovereign citizens, as it is evident that the 26^th judicial district court is desperately trying to do.

When one strips the pretense away only tyranny and betrayal are left, rationalized under color of law.

Considering the forgoing, Malinda Nicole DiRosa does demand that the one supreme Court in which the judicial power of the United States shall be vested do accept its obligation and duty and end this tyranny.

With this in mind, this Petitioner does hereby notice this Court that there is no proof that judge Ford E. Stinson, Jr. nor the district attorney were notified of the demand for the one supreme Court in which the judicial power of the United States shall be vested to correct this grievous wrong that the 26^th Judicial District Court is perpetrating upon this Sovereign, Citizen of the State of Louisiana. This Petitioner does hereby notice the supreme Court that the Petitioner will pretend, too, that Ford E. Stinson, Jr. nor the district attorney know of the original petition and have not remained silent for lack of defense. The Petitioner does also question the apparent collusion of Cynthia J Johnston and the Bossier parish clerks to defraud the petitioner under color of law. Therefore, this petitioner does notice the supreme Court that she has authorized her translator, next friend and co-accuser of BOBBY JINDAL and JAMES D. "BUDDY" CALDWELL for treason against the State of Louisiana and its Sovereign People to submit this correction in the certificate of service of the original petition for writ of Habeas Corpus, to expand the proof of confessed tyranny and to demand some notification that the wheels of justice are indeed turning. The amendment to the certificate of service for the original petition for the writ of Habeas Corpus and the certificate of service of this document can be found in the Certificate of service of this document.

This leaves the last problem. Is there a reason why this Petitioner has not heard word from the one supreme Court in which the judicial power of the United States has been vested both in the petition for writ of habeas corpus and the formal accusation of treason against the States of Louisiana? Is there some errant jot or tittle that is deemed more important than the issues involved of which this Petitioner is unaware? Has another clerk of court decided to play the role of the poor sap and fall on the sword for his lord and master? As of the 15^th day of July, 2009 the petitioner has not received the return receipt from the supreme Court, yet two round trip correspondences have been had with the 26^th judicial district court in that time. No word has come from the clerk of the supreme Court despite the correct phone number of record being given to them with instructions and no mail has been returned. All attempts to acquire information by phone have been fruitless too.

It is hereby demanded that the one supreme Court in which the judicial Power of the United States shall be vested accept its duty and obligation and end this tyrannical mockery of the Declaration of Independence, the United States Constitution, the intent of the founders of this once great nation and the sovereignty of the State of Louisiana and its Sovereign Citizens, or in the alternative, that official notice be given by this Court as to what jot or tittle shall be deemed more important than the issues involved in these actions so that they may be immediately corrected.

I, Michael E. DiRosa do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct statement of the position of Malinda Nicole DiRosa. and that the above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I, Michael E. DiRosa do further certify that Malinda Nicole DiRosa has authorized me to sign her name on her behalf as also certifying that the above is true and correct to the best of her knowledge and belief.

Certified this 15^th day of July, 2009.

CORRECTION TO THE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ON THE ORIGINAL PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF THIS AMENDMENT TO THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND NOTICE OF THE UNEXPLAINED SILENCE OF THE COURT.

I, Michael E. DiRosa, Sovereign, Citizen of the State of Louisiana, translator, typist, next friend, father and co-accuser of BOBBY JINDAL and JAMES D. "BUDDY" CALDWELL for treason against the State of Louisiana and its Sovereign People do hereby certify that true and correct copies of the original petition for writ of Habeas Corpus have been sent to the 26^th judicial district court and have twice been returned by people claiming to be the clerks of that court with the ridiculous claim that copies need original signatures. I would be a poor translator indeed if I took this evidence on its face. Malinda Nicole DiRosa has had only the highest praise for every clerk of that court that she has come in contact with. It is therefore incumbent upon us to allow the clerk the benefit of the doubt in this matter especially since the record in the above mentioned cases shows a habit of the officers of the occupational government to illegally frame innocent people. With this in mind we have decided to, for the 3^rd time, follow the usual procedure and submit the copies of the original writ of Habeas Corpus intended for the judge of record and the unknown district attorney in these cases to the clerk of the court.

I, Michael E. DiRosa, do further certify that a true and correct copies of this AMENDMENT TO THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND NOTICE OF THE UNEXPLAINED SILENCE OF THE COURT, with all new exhibits, have also, in the same envelope, been sent to the clerk of the 26^th judicial district court by entrusting it into the care of the United States postal authority. One copy for the judge and one copy for the district attorney, with a separate copy of this certificate of service as a cover.

Now, we will all watch and see if the clerk is indeed a treasonous conspirator, or an innocent dupe framed by the lawlessness of unnamed treasonous cowards.

However, if the clerk or someone pretending to be the clerk, does again return these copies, I, Michael E. DiRosa do hereby certify that I will, at the earliest possible time, resend these documents directly to the judge of record, currently Ford E. Stinson, Jr. and the district attorney's office directly, thereby bypassing the clerk of court and shall notice the supreme Court of such action and the need for such an action.

Certified this 15^th day of July, 2009

Michael E. DiRosa

c/o 318 Lakeshore Pkwy.

New Orleans, Louisiana 70124

XXX -XXX -XXXX

Citizen of the State of Louisiana,

interpreter and next friend of Malinda Nicole

Co-accuser of Bobby Jindal and

James D. "Buddy" Caldwell of

Treason against the State of Louisiana

and its Sovereign Citizens.