TWENTY-SIXTH JUDICIAL
DISTRICT COURT
STATE OF LOUISIANA
PARISH OF BOSSIER
| STATE OF LOUISIANA, |
) CRIMINAL DOCKET NO.: 172,621, 172,622, |
|
) 172,623 |
| PLAINTIFF, |
) |
|
) |
| VS |
) |
|
) |
| MALINDA NICOLE DiROSA, |
) NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR CONTINUANCE |
|
) UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE SUPREME COURT |
|
) DOES RULE ON THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS |
| FRAUDULENTLY ACCUSED |
) MAILED NEXT DAY SERVICE, RETURN RECEIPT |
|
) REQUESTED ON THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2009 AND |
|
) THE PARTICULARS OF THE CHARGES BROUGHT |
|
) BE MADE KNOWN TO THE ALLEGED |
|
) DEFENDANT,TO INCLUDE THE CAUSE OF |
|
) ACTION, RIGHT OF ACTION AND STANDING OF |
|
) THE PLAINTIFF AND JURISDICTION OF THIS |
|
) COURT. |
Comes
now into court Malinda Nicole DiRosa, a Citizen of the State of
Louisiana, appearing specially in proper person, unschooled in the
law, demanding all of her rights under the Constitution of the United
States and the Bill of Rights, to demand all proceedings in the above
entitled matter be stayed until such time as the Supreme Court does
rule on the Writ of Habeas Corpus mailed next day service, return
receipt requested on the 2nd day of July, 2009 and the
particulars of the charges brought be made known to the alleged
Defendant, to include the cause of action, right of action and
standing of the plaintiff and jurisdiction of this court.
If
anyone has any cause or reason to believe that I am not a Citizen of
the State of Louisiana, I demand that they bring their contention
forward so that I may denounce it as the fraud that it is. Surely it
can not be any affiliation with the Social Security administration
nor other affiliations as these affiliations have been forced upon me
at the point of a bayonet by the treasonous conspirators who have
overthrown the United States as confessed by the Louisiana Bar
Association in the Dubious origins of the 14th amendment.
Hence, all such organizations do not, in effect, exist as they were
created by an illegitimate government posing as the government of the
United States and therefore only pretend to exist under color of law.
In fact, there has been no valid treaty or law created since the
conspirators in congress overthrew congress and invaded and conquered
the Sovereign Citizens of the State of Louisiana.
One can
not know if and when the one supreme court in which the judicial
power of the United States will receive the Writ of Habeas Corpus
mailed next day service, return receipt requested on the 2nd
day of July, 2009. The United States Postal Authority does state
that notice was left with the Supreme Court on the 3rd and
5th of July, 2009 and as of the 5th of July,
the Writ has not been collected by the supreme court.
This
alleged Defendant does regret the lateness of the hour but it must be
remembered that the alleged Defendant did serve the 26th
Judicial District Court with the notice and demand for dismissal for
want of jurisdiction of the court and lack of cause of action, right
of action and standing of the plaintiff. constructive notice of
treason conspiracy and fraud on the 3rd day of June, 2009
and did not receive the denial of that demand, filed on the 24th
day of June, 2009, until the 27th of June. Hence, the
lateness of the hour is a direct result of the delay of the 26th
Judicial District Court and beyond the control of the alleged
Defendant. The alleged Defendant did even notice the court of the
delay in transit of any response by this court.
Nor can
the failure of the one supreme court in which the judicial power of
the United States to pick up its mail be held against the alleged
Defendant as notice was, so far, twice left with the supreme court,
according to the Postal authority's web site.
The
alleged Defendant did further notice the 26th Judicial
District court that she had enlisted the aid of her own trusted
interpreter, father and next friend to translate the language of the
court into colloquial English and her position from colloquial
English to legalese as she, with good reason, does not trust any
other translator especially a court appointed translator and did,
appropriately, notice the court of time delay required to transport
her translator to the court. Hence, as a direct result of the delay
of the 26th judicial district court and circumstances
beyond the control of the alleged Defendant and her translator, her
translator could not appear on such short notice, plus, he is waiting
for word from the supreme court at the address and phone number of
record.
Since
these documents must be prepared in advance and shipped to the
alleged Defendant, it is unknown, at this time, whether the One
supreme court in which the judicial power of the United States shall
be vested will have issued a ruling on the Writ of Habeas Corpus by
the 8th day of July, 2009, the date of the scheduled
hearing or if the supreme court will have even received the writ of
Habeas Corpus. However, it must be plain that until the writ of
Habeas Corpus is returned, the supreme court has jurisdiction and
hence, the 26th Judicial Court, for another valid reason
has no jurisdiction.
However,
if by the day of the hearing, for some reason, the supreme court has
denied the writ or, for some reason, the supreme court has not
received the writ of Habeas Corpus, there can still be no reason for
any valid objection to the continuance, unless, for some reason,
judge Stinson, Jr. is in a rush to judgment. For to proceed, again,
against the alleged Defendant, with full knowledge that she does not
understand the language of the court and is uninformed as to the full
nature of the charges against her would be as heinous an act as judge
Stinson, Jr. has committed before in cases numbered 157,313 and
157,314.
Any
action by any party to deny this demand for a continuance shall be
and must be construed as prima facia evidence that this alleged
Defendant can not receive a fair hearing before the jurisdictionally
deficient 26th Judicial District court and that this
hearing must be moved to a different jurisdiction.
I do
hereby certify that the above is true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief and that my position has been correctly
translated into the language of the court by my translator and next
friend and father Michael E. DiRosa. I do hereby also reject any
other translator especially one of the treasonous conspirators of the
Louisiana Bar Association.
Malinda
Nicole DiRosa
c/o 318
Lakeshore Pkwy.
New
Orleans, La. 70124
XXX - XXX - XXXX
I do
hereby certify that a true and correct copy of this document has been
prepared and filed either before court in the clerk's office or in
open court. The Original for the Court and a true and correct copy
for the district attorney.
Malinda
Nicole DiRosa
c/o 318
Lakeshore Pkwy.
New
Orleans, La. 70124
XXX - XXX - XXXX
TOP
|
