There is a little preamble needed to this confession instead of a translation.

The person confessing is a thrice certified overseer of the Negroes (member of three lodges if you will.) He is not concerned that they have betrayed us, overthrown our government and stolen our unalienable rights, he is concerned that the Treason may be repeated and the current dynasty will be overthrown.

At the outset he tells you that "this article is not motivated by a dissatisfaction evidenced in some quarters with the recent rulings of the Supreme Court of the United States." He is referring to the rulings of the Supreme Court of the United States which were declaring that black Negroes had the same rights as white Negroes. This was why The Dubious Origins of the 14th amendment. [translation], among others, was written. The sworn associates of the Bar were, in no uncertain terms, telling the Supreme Court of the United States that if you keep ruling that black citizens of the United States (Negroes) have the same rights as white citizens of the United States (Negroes) then we are going to spill the beans about the overthrow of the United States. Well, he is not doing this as blackmail. He is a loyal subject of the master. He is writing this out of concern that the master will be overthrown and be replaced with another Hitler.

He is also not advocating any effort to have the 14th Amendment declared invalid, although he deplores the means that were employed to obtain the end. So, as a thrice certified overseer, he doesn't mind that the lawyers have betrayed you, stolen your unalienable rights and reconstructed you into a sub-human Negro, he just thinks that they could have done it another way.

He is not concerned with the overthrow of the United States, he is just concerned that the United States will be overthrown again and a tyrant worse than themselves will come to power by the same means. He is just concerned with the preservation of the current tyrant from which he derives his power. He is saying let us close the legal loop hole before what we have done unto others gets done unto us.

After this comes a pretty straight forward accounting of the overthrow of the United States which matches the account given in The Dubious Origins of the 14th amendment. [translation].

Notice carefully the section entitled "Attempts to Obtain a Decision of the Supreme Court."

Here he will tell you that the traitors in control of Congress passed a law which took away the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to decide that type of case.

When Congress was overthrown they ceased to be the valid congress. Then these traitors made a rule that the Supreme Court can not say that the overthrow of the United States was illegal. (An action of Congress is presumed to be legal until it is ruled otherwise. They only remember the rules they like while they pretend that they are just following the rules. But, what the hell, you don't know when they are cheating.) A valid Congress has no more right to do this than it had to free the slaves in the territories.

Remember, in the Dred Scott case. [translation] (Scott v. Sandford) the Supreme Court said that Congress could not free the slaves in the territories. They had just ruled on the validity of an act of Congress.

When the Supreme Court ceased to do its job they betrayed us. They became Traitors themselves and the overthrow of the United States was complete. In fact, this article and the Dubious Origins of the 14th Amendment quite plainly say that had the Supreme Court not betrayed us, the overthrow of the United States would have failed.

You can see it in operation in my cases. The Clerk keeps telling us that they can only hear cases in accordance with federal law. Federal law says this court can not rule that the overthrow of the United States was illegal. They will betray us and pretend that they are just following the rules. The rules of the new tyrant that is. (U.S. Supreme Court betrays us all, again.)

This document confirms it. There is nothing wrong with the form of my submissions, it is the controversy that is not in accordance with federal law.

There is no more doubt. The supreme Court of our Constitution is DEAD. The sworn associates of the Bar have betrayed us and will continue to betray us.

"Misprision of treason. The bare knowledge and concealment of an act of treason or treasonable plot, that is, without any assent or participation therein, for if the latter elements be present the party becomes a principal. 4 Bl. Comm. 120; Pen.Code Cal. § 38" Black's Law Dictionary Pg. 1194

"Misprision of treason. is the concealment of treason by being merely passive. Act of Congress of April 30, 1790, R.S. § 5333; 1 East, Pl. ?Cr.139. If any assistance be given to the traitor, it makes the party a principal, as there are no accessories in treason." Bouviers Law Dictionary Vol II Pg 810

A scary question you could ask now is: Could this have happened while Lincoln was alive? Or, on a more frightening note, was the takeover of the United States a crime of opportunity or was our Civil War engineered to raise the army needed to overthrow the United States? In either case, in a supreme act of ignorance and stupidity, we overthrew ourselves? Can there be any doubt that your ignorance of law is no accident or oversight? As we are so often told by our betrayers, ignorance of the law is no excuse.

As a small side note, my condolences to historians who believe they can know the history of any culture without a sound understanding of law. Law shapes everything in a culture. It is as ridiculous as believing that you can understand the bible without a sound understanding of Astrology. But, then again, we were all fooled. After all, why ask why?

Here are the thoughts of the founders of our once great nation on the subject.

"The complete independence of the courts of justice is peculiarly essential in a limited constitution. By a limited constitution I understand one which contains certain specified exceptions to the legislative authority; such for instance as that it shall pass no bills of attainder, no ex post facto laws, and the like. Limitations of this kind can be preserved in practice no other way than through the medium of the courts of justice; whose duty it must be to declare all acts contrary to the manifest tenor of the constitution void. Without this, all the reservations of particular rights or privileges would amount to nothing." Publius, The Federalist No. 78.

"There is no position which depends on clearer principles, than that every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act therefore contrary to the constitution can be valid. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy is greater than his principle; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid." Publius, The Federalist No. 78.

"It is not otherwise to be supposed that the constitution could intend to enable the representatives of the people to substitute their will to that of their constituents. It is far more rational to suppose that the courts were designed to be an intermediate body between the people and the legislature, in order, among other things, to keep the latter within the limits assigned to their authority. The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts, A constitution is in fact, and must be, regarded by the judges as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. If there should happen to be an irreconcilable variance between the two, that which has the superior obligation and validity ought of course to be preferred; or in other words, the constitution ought to be preferred to the stature, the intention of the people to the intention of their agents.

Nor does this conclusion by any means suppose a superiority of the judicial to the legislative power, It only supposes that the power of the people is superior to both; and that where the will of the legislature declared in its statutes, stands in opposition to that of the people declared in the constitution, the judges ought to be governed by the latter, rather than the former. They ought to regulate their decisions by the fundamental laws, rather than by those which are not fundamental." Publius, The Federalist No. 78.

One last point. Notice in the section entitled "Danger to Our Form of Government" he gives the scenario for the rise of the dictator of the United States.

As a small side note to this point, a lesson in translating legalese. Notice the title "Danger to Our Form of Government." To what form of government is he referring? Remember, he likes being an overseer. He just doesn't want it to end. In New Orleans our police cars bear the motto; "To Protect and to Serve." To Protect and to Serve whom? Now you know that it is the occupational government they are protecting and serving. It surely isn't you. After all, why ask why?

When the true history of the United States becomes common knowledge this tyranny will end and our freedom and unalienable rights will be restored. Our government will, once again, be the servant of We, The People and not our master. Remember, it is our fellow Sovereigns and sworn allies staffing the police and military. They, their families and children were betrayed just as surely as you were.

Now, let the traitor confess.

(The document without this preamble can be found here )
(click any image for that image in a new page.)